home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.crackers,alt.cracks,alt.religion.scientology,alt.cyberspace,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,alt.games.duke3d,alt.flame,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.descent,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.bigfoot
- Path: news.emi.net!news
- From: "orlo@emi.net" <orlo@emi.net>
- Subject: Re: NT or 95?
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Sender: news@emi.net (EmiNet Domain News Admin)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Organization: EmiNet Domain Internet Services (407)731-0222
- Message-ID: <316C4EC8.400E@emi.net>
- References: <3161C78E.478D@hydro.on.ca> <4kc4lk$m8@news.wco.com> <4kfsnu$7s3@hp01.redwood.nl>
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0B2 (Win95; I)
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: orlo.emi.net
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:14:00 GMT
-
- Fidelio wrote:
- >
- > LewM@PacX.Com (Lewis Mettler) writes:
- >
- > >Lisa Wang <lisa.wang@hydro.on.ca> wrote:
- >
- > >If you want to go slow use NT.
- >
- > >If you want unreliable operation use 95.
- >
- > >If you rather go fast and be reliable you will have to use OS/2.
- >
- > Fast and reliable, that sounds like Linux to me. Going fast until it
- > suddenly crashes, with no applications to run, not supporting the most
- > common hardware, that's OS/2.
- >
-
- But, the question is...Can I load Win NT in a Win 95 directory? Will both OS's
- be operational on my HD?
-
-
- --
- Respectfully... William A.Orlowski E-MAIL: orlo@emi.net
- WWW: http://www.lookup.com/homepages/56215/home.html
- Or on my home pc: http://orlo.emi.net FTP: ftp://orlo.emi.net
- If you can't hack a college computer to give yourself a degree in
- Computer Science...then you probably don't deserve one.
-